Psychotherapy For Clients

Psychotherapy For Clients With Addictive

Assignment: Psychotherapy For Clients With Addictive Disorders

Addictive disorders can be particularly challenging for clients. Not only do these disorders typically interfere with a client’s ability to function in daily life, but they also often manifest as negative and sometimes criminal behaviors. Sometime clients with addictive disorders also suffer from other mental health issues, creating even greater struggles for them to overcome. In your role, you have the opportunity to help clients address their addictions and improve outcomes for both the clients and their families.
To prepare:

• Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide about diagnosing and treating addictive disorders. As you watch the 187 Models of Treatment for Addiction video, consider what treatment model you may use the most with clients presenting with addiction.
• Search the Walden Library databases and choose a research article that discusses a therapeutic approach for treating clients, families, or groups with addictive disorders.Rubric Detail
  Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
  Content
  Name: NRNP_6645_Week8_Assignment_Rubric
  Grid View
  List View
  Excellent 90%–100% Good 80%–89% Fair 70%–79% Poor 0%–69%
  Develop a 5- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation on your selected research article discussing a therapeutic approach for treating clients, families, or groups with addictive disorders. •Provide an overview of the article you selected, including: What population (individual, group, or family) is under consideration? What was the specific intervention that was used? Is this a new intervention or one that was already used? What were the author’s claims? Points: Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%) The presentation thoroughly and accurately defines the considered population. The specific intervention used is fully and accurately described. The description clearly indicates whether the intervention is new or whether it was already studied. The response includes a thorough and accurate description of the author’s claims. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) The presentation defines the considered population. The specific intervention used is described. The description indicates whether the intervention is new or whether it was already studied. The response includes a description of the author’s claims. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) There is an incomplete definition of the considered population. The specific intervention used is partially or inaccurately described. The response includes a partial or inaccurate description of the author’s claims. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%) There is an incomplete definition of the considered population, or it is missing. The specific intervention used is partially or inaccurately described, or is missing. The response includes a partial or inaccurate description of the author’s claims, or is missing. Feedback:
  o Explain the findings/outcomes of the study in the article. Include whether this will translate into practice with your clients. If so, how? If not, why? Points: Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The presentation includes a thorough and accurate review of the findings of the selected article. The response fully addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The presentation includes a review of the findings of the selected article. The response addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The presentation includes a somewhat inaccurate or incomplete review of the findings of the selected article. The response partially or inaccurately addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The presentation includes an inaccurate and incomplete review of the findings of the selected article, or is missing. The response partially or inaccurately addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients, or is missing. Feedback:
  • Explain whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings/outcomes presented in the article. Points: Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The presentation includes a thorough and accurate explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The presentation includes an explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The presentation includes a somewhat inaccurate or incomplete explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The presentation includes an inaccurate or incomplete explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article, or is missing. Feedback:
  •Use the Notes function of PowerPoint to craft presenter notes to expand upon the content of your slides. Points: Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%) The Notes function of the presentation is appropriately used to comprehensively expand upon the presentation slides. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%) The Notes function of the presentation is adequately used to expand upon the presentation slides. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%) The Notes function of the presentation is utilized but notes are vague or contain small inaccuracies. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) The Notes function of the presentation partially or inaccurately expands upon the presentation slides, or is not included. Feedback:
  • Support your response with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources. Explain why each of your supporting sources is scholarly. References are included on your last slide. PDFs of sources are included with submission. Points: Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%) The presentation is strongly supported with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. References are included on the last slide. PDFs of sources are included with submission. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%) The presentation is supported with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. References are included on the last slide. PDFs of sources are included with submission. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%) The presentation is supported with two or three peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. Accurate references may not be included on the last slide. PDFs of sources may be missing. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) The presentation is supported with resources peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources, or the sources are missing. Feedback:
  Written Expression and Formatting – Style and Organization: Slides are clear and not overly crowded. Sentences in presenter notes are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Slides are clear, concise, and visually appealing. Sentences in presenter notes follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Slides are clear and concise. Sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Slides may be somewhat unorganized or crowded. Sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Slides are unorganized and/or crowded. Sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. Feedback:
  Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3 or 4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback:Show Descriptions Show Feedback
  Develop a 5- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation on your selected research article discussing a therapeutic approach for treating clients, families, or groups with addictive disorders. •Provide an overview of the article you selected, including: What population (individual, group, or family) is under consideration? What was the specific intervention that was used? Is this a new intervention or one that was already used? What were the author’s claims?–
  Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 18 (18%) – 20 (20%) The presentation thoroughly and accurately defines the considered population. The specific intervention used is fully and accurately described. The description clearly indicates whether the intervention is new or whether it was already studied. The response includes a thorough and accurate description of the author’s claims. Good 80%–89% 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) The presentation defines the considered population. The specific intervention used is described. The description indicates whether the intervention is new or whether it was already studied. The response includes a description of the author’s claims. Fair 70%–79% 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) There is an incomplete definition of the considered population. The specific intervention used is partially or inaccurately described. The response includes a partial or inaccurate description of the author’s claims. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 13 (13%) There is an incomplete definition of the considered population, or it is missing. The specific intervention used is partially or inaccurately described, or is missing. The response includes a partial or inaccurate description of the author’s claims, or is missing. Feedback:
  o Explain the findings/outcomes of the study in the article. Include whether this will translate into practice with your clients. If so, how? If not, why?–
  Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The presentation includes a thorough and accurate review of the findings of the selected article. The response fully addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients. Good 80%–89% 20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The presentation includes a review of the findings of the selected article. The response addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients. Fair 70%–79% 18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The presentation includes a somewhat inaccurate or incomplete review of the findings of the selected article. The response partially or inaccurately addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The presentation includes an inaccurate and incomplete review of the findings of the selected article, or is missing. The response partially or inaccurately addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients, or is missing. Feedback:
  • Explain whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings/outcomes presented in the article.–
  Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The presentation includes a thorough and accurate explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article. Good 80%–89% 20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The presentation includes an explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article. Fair 70%–79% 18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The presentation includes a somewhat inaccurate or incomplete explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The presentation includes an inaccurate or incomplete explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article, or is missing. Feedback:
  •Use the Notes function of PowerPoint to craft presenter notes to expand upon the content of your slides.–
  Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 9 (9%) – 10 (10%) The Notes function of the presentation is appropriately used to comprehensively expand upon the presentation slides. Good 80%–89% 8 (8%) – 8 (8%) The Notes function of the presentation is adequately used to expand upon the presentation slides. Fair 70%–79% 7 (7%) – 7 (7%) The Notes function of the presentation is utilized but notes are vague or contain small inaccuracies. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) The Notes function of the presentation partially or inaccurately expands upon the presentation slides, or is not included. Feedback:
  • Support your response with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources. Explain why each of your supporting sources is scholarly. References are included on your last slide. PDFs of sources are included with submission.–
  Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 9 (9%) – 10 (10%) The presentation is strongly supported with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. References are included on the last slide. PDFs of sources are included with submission. Good 80%–89% 8 (8%) – 8 (8%) The presentation is supported with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. References are included on the last slide. PDFs of sources are included with submission. Fair 70%–79% 7 (7%) – 7 (7%) The presentation is supported with two or three peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. Accurate references may not be included on the last slide. PDFs of sources may be missing. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) The presentation is supported with resources peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources, or the sources are missing. Feedback:
  Written Expression and Formatting – Style and Organization: Slides are clear and not overly crowded. Sentences in presenter notes are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.–
  Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Slides are clear, concise, and visually appealing. Sentences in presenter notes follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. Good 80%–89% 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Slides are clear and concise. Sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Fair 70%–79% 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Slides may be somewhat unorganized or crowded. Sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Slides are unorganized and/or crowded. Sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. Feedback:
  Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation–
  Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Good 80%–89% 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Fair 70%–79% 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3 or 4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback:
  Total Points: 100
  Name: NRNP_6645_Week8_Assignment_Rubric

  ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

  Who We Are 

  We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched for a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help with your coursework.

  Do you handle any type of coursework?

  Yes. We have posted our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication.

  Is it hard to Place an Order?

  • 1. Click on “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
  • 2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
  • 3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
  • 4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
  • 5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.

  SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS: ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT

  We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

  • Discussion Questions (DQ)

  Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

  • Weekly Participation

  Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

  • APA Format and Writing Quality

  Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

  • Use of Direct Quotes

  I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

  • LopesWrite Policy

  For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

  • Late Policy

  The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

  • Communication

  Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

  • Guarantee
  • Zero Plagiarism
  • On-time delivery
  • A-Grade Papers
  • Free Revision
  • 24/7 Support
  • 100% Confidentiality
  • Professional Writers
  • Services Offered
  • Custom paper writing
  • Question and answers
  • Essay paper writing
  • Editing and proofreading
  • Plagiarism removal services
  • Multiple answer questions

  SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS: ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT

  We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

  Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper