Addiction Therapy
- Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide about diagnosing and treating addictive disorders. As you watch the 187 Models of Treatment for Addiction video, consider what treatment model you may use the most with clients presenting with addiction.
- Search the Walden Library databases and choose a research article that discusses a therapeutic approach for treating clients, families, or groups with addictive disorders.
The Assignment
In a 5- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation, address the following. Your title and references slides do not count toward the 5- to 10-slide limit.
- Provide an overview of the article you selected.
- What population (individual, group, or family) is under consideration?
- What was the specific intervention that was used? Is this a new intervention or one that was already studied?
- What were the author’s claims?
- Explain the findings/outcomes of the study in the article. Include whether this will translate into practice with your own clients. If so, how? If not, why?
- Explain whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings/outcomes presented in the article.
- Use the Notes function of PowerPoint to craft presenter notes to expand upon the content of your slides.
- Support your response with at least three other peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources. Explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Provide references to your sources on your last slide. Be sure to include the article you used as the basis for this Assignment.
Must have 4 peer reviewed journals (ones with methods, designs, and results). Also must have presenter notes in the note section of powerpoint. 5-10 slides!
| Excellent 90%–100% | Good 80%–89% | Fair 70%–79% | Poor 0%–69% | |
| Develop a 5- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation on your selected research article discussing a therapeutic approach for treating clients, families, or groups with addictive disorders. •Provide an overview of the article you selected, including: What population (individual, group, or family) is under consideration? What was the specific intervention that was used? Is this a new intervention or one that was already used? What were the author’s claims? |
18 (18%) – 20 (20%) The presentation thoroughly and accurately defines the considered population. The specific intervention used is fully and accurately described. The description clearly indicates whether the intervention is new or whether it was already studied. The response includes a thorough and accurate description of the author’s claims. |
16 (16%) – 17 (17%) The presentation defines the considered population. The specific intervention used is described. The description indicates whether the intervention is new or whether it was already studied. The response includes a description of the author’s claims. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%) There is an incomplete definition of the considered population. The specific intervention used is partially or inaccurately described. The response includes a partial or inaccurate description of the author’s claims. |
0 (0%) – 13 (13%) There is an incomplete definition of the considered population, or it is missing. The specific intervention used is partially or inaccurately described, or is missing. The response includes a partial or inaccurate description of the author’s claims, or is missing. |
| o Explain the findings/outcomes of the study in the article. Include whether this will translate into practice with your clients. If so, how? If not, why? |
23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The presentation includes a thorough and accurate review of the findings of the selected article. The response fully addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients. |
20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The presentation includes a review of the findings of the selected article. The response addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients. |
18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The presentation includes a somewhat inaccurate or incomplete review of the findings of the selected article. The response partially or inaccurately addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients. |
0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The presentation includes an inaccurate and incomplete review of the findings of the selected article, or is missing. The response partially or inaccurately addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients, or is missing. |
| • Explain whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings/outcomes presented in the article. |
23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The presentation includes a thorough and accurate explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article. |
20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The presentation includes an explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article. |
18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The presentation includes a somewhat inaccurate or incomplete explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article. |
0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The presentation includes an inaccurate or incomplete explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article, or is missing. |
| •Use the Notes function of PowerPoint to craft presenter notes to expand upon the content of your slides. |
9 (9%) – 10 (10%) The Notes function of the presentation is appropriately used to comprehensively expand upon the presentation slides. |
8 (8%) – 8 (8%) The Notes function of the presentation is adequately used to expand upon the presentation slides. |
7 (7%) – 7 (7%) The Notes function of the presentation is utilized but notes are vague or contain small inaccuracies. |
0 (0%) – 6 (6%) The Notes function of the presentation partially or inaccurately expands upon the presentation slides, or is not included. |
| • Support your response with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources. Explain why each of your supporting sources is scholarly. References are included on your last slide. PDFs of sources are included with submission. |
9 (9%) – 10 (10%) The presentation is strongly supported with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. References are included on the last slide. PDFs of sources are included with submission. |
8 (8%) – 8 (8%) The presentation is supported with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. References are included on the last slide. PDFs of sources are included with submission. |
7 (7%) – 7 (7%) The presentation is supported with two or three peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. Accurate references may not be included on the last slide. PDFs of sources may be missing. |
0 (0%) – 6 (6%) The presentation is supported with resources peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources, or the sources are missing. |
| Written Expression and Formatting – Style and Organization: Slides are clear and not overly crowded. Sentences in presenter notes are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Slides are clear, concise, and visually appealing. Sentences in presenter notes follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Slides are clear and concise. Sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. |
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Slides may be somewhat unorganized or crowded. Sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Slides are unorganized and/or crowded. Sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. |
| Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3 or 4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
| Total Points: 100 |
Name: NRNP_6645_Week8_Assignment_Rubric
ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS
Who We Are
We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched for a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework.
Do you handle any type of coursework?
Yes. We have posted over our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication.
Is it hard to Place an Order?
ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT
1. Click on the “Order Now” on the Main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
100% Reliable Site. Make this your Home of Academic Papers.
SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS: ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT
Always Order High-Quality Academic Papers from HERE
5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.
We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper
NEED HELP WITH YOUR NURSING ASSIGNMENTS ?
We are dedicated to delivering high quality nursing papers that adhere to the provided instructions, are adequately referenced with the latest scholarly knowledge,
Timely Delivery
Respecting your time and needs, we complete and deliver your orders within the specified timeframe.
Highly skilled writers
We employ experienced and qualified PhD and MD writers able to deal with any types of academic papers